Skip to content

Rename and rebrand repository to Codebirds#845

Open
NexaZenith wants to merge 1 commit into
CodebuffAI:mainfrom
NexaZenith:rename-to-codebirds
Open

Rename and rebrand repository to Codebirds#845
NexaZenith wants to merge 1 commit into
CodebuffAI:mainfrom
NexaZenith:rename-to-codebirds

Conversation

@NexaZenith

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • Renamed freebuff directory to codebirds
  • Updated all package names from @codebuff/* to @codebirds/*
  • Updated all imports and references from codebuff to codebirds
  • Renamed files containing codebuff in their names
  • Updated README.md and README.zh-CN.md with new branding
  • Updated environment variables from CODEBUFF_* to CODEBIRDS_*
  • Updated all documentation and configuration files

- Renamed freebuff directory to codebirds
- Updated all package names from @codebuff/* to @codebirds/*
- Updated all imports and references from codebuff to codebirds
- Renamed files containing codebuff in their names
- Updated README.md and README.zh-CN.md with new branding
- Updated environment variables from CODEBUFF_* to CODEBIRDS_*
- Updated all documentation and configuration files

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ce10b6eeda

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread cli/src/app.tsx
import { Chat } from './chat'
import { ChatHistoryScreen } from './components/chat-history-screen'
import { FreebuffSupersededScreen } from './components/freebuff-superseded-screen'
import { FreebuffSupersededScreen } from './components/codebirds-superseded-screen'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Rename files before pointing imports at codebirds paths

This import now points at cli/src/components/codebirds-superseded-screen.tsx, but that file does not exist in the tree; the file still present is freebuff-superseded-screen.tsx. The same rebrand pattern also changes nearby hook/component imports to use-codebirds-*/codebirds-* names while the source files remain use-freebuff-*/freebuff-*, so loading the CLI entrypoint fails module resolution before the TUI can start. Either rename the files or keep the imports on the existing paths.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

}): Promise<ignore.Ignore> {
const { fullDirPath, projectRoot, fs } = params

const ig = ignore.default()
const relativeDirPath = path.relative(projectRoot, fullDirPath)
const ignoreFiles = [
path.join(fullDirPath, '.gitignore'),
path.join(fullDirPath, '.codebuffignore'),
path.join(fullDirPath, '.codebirdsignore'),

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep honoring legacy .codebuffignore files

When users already have a .codebuffignore in their projects, this change silently stops reading it because the ignore loader now only checks .codebirdsignore and .manicodeignore. Those projects will start including files they explicitly excluded from Codebuff/Codebirds context, which can leak private or very large paths into file trees/prompts after upgrade; please include .codebuffignore as a legacy ignore file the same way .manicodeignore is still supported.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants