Skip to content

[GeneralDichotomy] handle no solution case#207

Open
smbct wants to merge 1 commit into
jump-dev:masterfrom
smbct:general_dichotomy_203
Open

[GeneralDichotomy] handle no solution case#207
smbct wants to merge 1 commit into
jump-dev:masterfrom
smbct:general_dichotomy_203

Conversation

@smbct

@smbct smbct commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In reply to #203:

I replaced the initial scalarization by w=(1, .., 1). The missing solution case can be detected at the beginning by solving a simple sum of the objectives:

  • if one of the objective is unbounded, any sum with non zero coefficients should be also unbounded
  • if the problem is infeasible, any linear scalarization should be infeasible as well

Then, if any sub-problem is infeasible, this must be due to numerical issues, hence returning MOI.NUMERICAL_ERROR in the main loop.

(PS sorry for the duplicate PR)

@smbct smbct changed the title handle no solution case [GeneralDichotomy] handle no solution case Jul 1, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 99.57%. Comparing base (b71397a) to head (d7d30c7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #207      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   99.64%   99.57%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          15       15              
  Lines        1421     1420       -1     
==========================================
- Hits         1416     1414       -2     
- Misses          5        6       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant