Fix use-after-free in RecursiveIteratorIterator on reentrant teardown#22478
Open
iliaal wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Fix use-after-free in RecursiveIteratorIterator on reentrant teardown#22478iliaal wants to merge 1 commit into
iliaal wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
spl_recursive_it_move_forward_ex() tears down the exhausted level after running its sub-iterator, but endChildren() and a sub-iterator's valid() can re-enter through $this->next() and tear that level down first. The no-more-elements branch then dtored a stale iterator pointer, and valid() kept running on a sub-iterator the reentrant call had already freed. Guard the teardown on the level's iterator being unchanged, and hold a reference on the sub-iterator across valid().
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Follow-up to the endChildren()/valid() reentry devnexen raised reviewing #22466. Both new cases reproduce under ASAN. This overlaps #22466 in spl_recursive_it_move_forward_ex(), so whichever lands first, the other takes a trivial rebase.